Improving US-Mexico Cooperation against Drug Smuggling and Other Cross-Border Crime


Photo: istock

By EARL ANTHONY  WAYNE  

On Tuesday, June 11, Ambassador Earl Anthony Wayne (ret) offered oral testimony before the U.S. Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control on the issue of countering the global narcotics epidemic through the United States’ Counter-Narcotics Strategy. This is a transcript of that testimony, as prepared for delivery.

The United States and Mexico are facing a powerful onslaught of cross-border criminal activity that demands improved bilateral law enforcement and justice cooperation.

U.S. threats to impose tariffs on Mexico to stop drug smuggling are counterproductive.  

The problems are much bigger than either country can handle alone.

Given recent events, it is important to recognize that managing migration and going after drug smuggling will draw on many of the same personnel and capacities in each country.  

The efforts must be well coordinated to avoid negative consequences.

Bilateral cooperation must effectively address the flows of dangerous drugs to the United States that feed addiction and overdose deaths here, as well as drug sale profits, which fund and help arm criminal organizations that spread violence and corruption in Mexico.

Mexico is a significant source and transit country for illegal drugs.

Mexico is a significant source and transit country for illegal drugs. It is believed to be the primary source of heroin to the United States, a main transit route for fentanyl from China, and a major producer of methamphetamines.  

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) argues that Mexican transnational criminal organizations remain the greatest criminal drug threat to the United States.

In 2017, Mexico and the United States agreed on a strategy to go after the entire chain of drug production, distribution and finances, and recognized that U.S. demand, as well as supply from Mexico, had to be addressed.  

However, sparked by public desire for better efforts against crime and corruption, Mexico’s current government is embarking on a wider multi-pronged strategy.

Mexico’s new public security strategy incorporates social, economic and other initiatives, as well as law enforcement tools, such as a new National Guard. Mexico seeks U.S. support for development projects as part of the mix.

The path forward is to reinvigorate bilateral cooperation in ways that acknowledge and incorporate the distinct, but overlapping, anti-crime priorities of both governments.

The path forward is to reinvigorate bilateral cooperation in ways that acknowledge and incorporate the distinct, but overlapping, anti-crime priorities of both governments.

Key for revitalizing counternarcotics cooperation is a thorough bilateral review of the challenges and existing cooperation, and hammering out a shared action agenda.

This should include a fresh look at the Merida Initiative, which has produced excellent assistance programs.

Over the last decade, under the umbrella of Merida, U.S. assistance helped strengthen Mexican capacities, including in counter-narcotics, and U.S.-Mexico law enforcement cooperation deepened.

Mexico’s new government has not completed an internal assessment of Merida, however, and President Andrés Manuel López Abrader (AMLO) recently said he would like to reorient Merida assistance to economic development.

This underscores the urgent need for thorough bilateral review of ongoing U.S.-Mexico cooperation and forging agreed priorities for tackling cross-border crime, including narcotics trafficking.  

The two governments should establish a cabinet-level coordination group to reconcile top public security priorities, to set out an action agenda, to monitor progress, to address problems that arise and to report to the two presidents.  

Without such a serious process, bilateral cooperation is likely to be scattershot, episodic and ineffective, and periodic blowups are more probable.  

Without a serious process, bilateral cooperation is likely to be scattershot, episodic and ineffective, and periodic blowups are more probable.  

In my written testimony, which accompanies this testimony, I share specific recommendations for collaboration, including on counter-narcotics, which were developed by a taskforce of Mexican and U.S. experts.  

Essential, however, is agreeing on a bilateral strategy and action agenda, and setting up the working arrangements to undertake capacity building and law enforcement work that generate mutual confidence and produce good results against narcotics trafficking and other cross-border crime.  

Earl Anthony Wayne is a public policy fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center and career ambassador (ret.) from the U.S. Diplomatic Service, where he served as U.S. ambassador to both Mexico and Argentina, as well as assistant secretary of State for economic and business affairs.

 

Categories: Crime, Mexico, Mexico-U.S. relations, Opinion, PoliticsTags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.