By EARL ANTHONY WAYNE, former U.S. ambassador to Mexico

(The following article first appeared in the U.S. political website “The Hill” and is being republished in Pulse News Mexico with specific prior permission.)    

It is increasingly urgent that the United States achieve stability and predictability with its two largest trading partners. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) warns of a “synchronized global slowdown” powered significantly by trade tensions, and the Institute of International Finance flags 20-year highs in global trade and economic uncertainty.

“Getting to Yes” on the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) this year would diminish these threats in North America.

Mexico and Canada are the No. 1 and No. 2 U.S. trading partners, respectively. They are the United States’ two largest export markets. The United States and they invest heavily in each other. The United States makes far more together with these neighbors than it makes with any other nation in the world. North American trade supports over 11 million U.S. jobs.

Passing the USMCA will provide clear rules for commerce in North America for at least 16 years.  Businesses and farmers will have the certainty needed to plan and invest in the massive North American marketplace — even if trade uncertainty still prevails with China and Europe, the United States’ other major commercial partners. Under the present circumstances, many companies are taking a wait-and-see attitude before making greater investments in the region.

U.S. business and farm organizations are pressing hard for approval. U.S. unions and Democrats in Congress remain skeptical. House Democrats and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer are engaged in talks to find common ground, especially over labor and enforcement issues in USMCA.

Most observers believe the USMCA approval needs to take place this year, before the 2020 U.S. presidential and congressional elections effectively close the chances for a positive vote until 2021.

Most observers believe the USMCA approval needs to take place this year, before the 2020 U.S. presidential and congressional elections effectively close the chances for a positive vote until 2021.

Though the USMCA is not perfect, it modernizes the current NAFTA, incorporating technological and trade practice changes of the past 25 years and offering valuable benefits.

Leaving these three deeply intertwined economies subject to threats of ending NAFTA from President Donald Trump or to future unpredictable actions by the United States — such as the U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, which sparked counter-tariffs on U.S. farm goods — is not a desirable future for U.S. workers, businesses and farmers, or for Mexico and Canada.

This is of particular importance to Mexico. It sells 80 percent of its exports to the United States, and the IMF predicts its economy will grow only 0.4 percent this year and 1.3 percent next year. There is great need for the long-term predictability that approving the USMCA would bring.

Mexico sells 80 percent of its exports to the United States, and the International Monetary Fund predicts its economy will grow only 0.4 percent this year and 1.3 percent next year.

Passage in 2019 depends on Lighthizer reaching an agreement with the Democratic majority in the House of Representatives that Mexico and Canada can accept. The Democrats have focused primarily on the means for enforcing labor provisions in the USMCA, with particular attention to whether Mexico’s labor reforms will allow Mexican unions and workers to exercise full rights in dealing with employers. U.S. unions long have argued that Mexico’s laws and practices allow employers to control unions and keep wages suppressed.

Mexico’s government under President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), however, passed significant labor reforms early in 2019 that established new rules for labor and union rights, and authorized a new court system and other institutions to implement those rules. Turning the reforms into a functioning system will be difficult and require substantial investment to build the new labor institutions and to support the emergence of democratic unions through elections.

U.S. unions and their congressional supporters are demanding assurances that the Mexican government will act promptly and invest sufficient resources. President Lopez Obrador sent a letter to House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-Mass.) last month promising such action.

Neal heads the team of congresspersons designated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to negotiate with Lighthizer on labor provisions and enforcement, as well as on concerns about environmental issues and some drug pricing provisions in the USMCA draft. Pelosi and key Democratic Congress members signal that they are on a path to possible agreement, while unions continue to flag concerns.

U.S. unions and their congressional supporters are demanding assurances that the Mexican government will act promptly and invest sufficient resources.

Mexico’s labor reform is a historic opportunity for positive change. The U.S. unions and Democrats should be considering not only steps to bolster “enforcement” of Mexico’s USMCA commitments but also ways in which the United States can support implementation of reforms.

“Getting to Yes” on the USMCA also can open opportunities for better cooperation on addressing the smuggling of hard drugs into the United States and dealing with violent cartels operating in Mexico, which are funded by drug sales in the United States. The recent cartel violence in Mexico underscores the urgency of the problems. Approving the USMCA also will support forging more sustainable longer-term solutions to migration challenges at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The United States has a strong interest in a prospering and stable Mexico. A growing Mexican economy, and one less plagued by violence, will generate fewer individuals seeking to enter the United States improperly.

The clashes between President Trump and House Democrats over impeachment sour the atmosphere for reaching agreement. Some Democrats will be hesitant to approve an agreement that the president will claim as a major victory, especially if they cannot show that Congress significantly improved the agreement.

The clashes between President Trump and House Democrats over impeachment sour the atmosphere for reaching agreement.

Pelosi will need to consider those factors when deciding whether to bring the USMCA to a vote in the House. In addition, Mexico and Canada will need to sign onto any provisions worked out between House Democrats and the U.S. administration.

In the weeks ahead, creativity to design specific substantive fixes and to meet the political needs of all parties will be key. Whatever happens, the parties should not impose further blows on the trilateral economic partnership the United States has built with Canada and Mexico. The players should also realize that a choice to leave NAFTA in place with continuing uncertainty risks freezing potential investment, when that boost is needed, given the adverse global environment and increasingly complicated security and economic situation in Mexico.

Congressional leaders and the Trump administration must demonstrate that the United Stats is committed to maintaining a stable, predictable and mutually beneficial relationship. If a path forward on the USMCA is found this year, North America’s economies will greatly benefit.

Earl Anthony Wayne is a public policy fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center and career ambassador (ret.) from the U.S. Diplomatic Service, where he served as U.S. ambassador to both Mexico and Argentina, as well as assistant secretary of State for economic and business affairs.